Regional inversion and technocapitalism
Regional inversion can be part
of a larger process of paradigm shift.
Paradigm shifts involve
radical change in various economic, social, institutional, political and
cultural dimensions. Typically, a paradigm shift breaks with the paths and
structures set in a preceding historical period. The predominance of economic
sectors, social orders, institutional, political and cultural power structures
can be radically changed during a process of paradigm shift.
Paradigm shifts are therefore
revolutionary in character. The process of change encompassed by a paradigm
shift is seldom evolutionary or incremental. Instead of building on the
structures of a preceding era, those arrangements are often overturned or
replaced. Changes that result from a paradigm shift are also often
irreversible, in the sense that the old order cannot be restored once the new
structures become established.
Regional inversion can be the
geographical manifestation of a process of paradigm shift. The possibility that
regional inversion may be part of the emergence of technocapitalism must be
considered. Technocapitalism is a new form of market capitalism involving a
departure from the structures of what may be referred to as industrial and
post-industrial capitalism. Because technocapitalism can be considered an
emerging new era, many of its features are still to be discovered.
Nevertheless, it is possible to discuss some aspects that can link regional
inversion to the rise of technocapitalism.
How does
regional inversion fit in with the rise of technocapitalism?
Among the various aspects that
can link regional inversion to technocapitalism, the role of intangibles is a
fundamental one. Regional inversion is driven by intangibles. New knowledge and
creativity are the most important intangibles supporting regional inversion.
Those intangibles are essential for spawning the new sectors and activities
upon which much of the dynamic of regional inversion depends.
Technocapitalism is also
driven by intangibles. Creativity and new knowledge are to technocapitalism
what tangible raw materials, factory labor and capital were to industrial
capitalism. Today, the intangibles that drive technocapitalism are acquiring
the highest economic value. They already account for three-quarters or more of
the worth of most products and services. Those intangibles are at the core of
the kinds of activities that are most likely to be representative of the
twenty-first century.
Second, regional inversion
relies strongly on a new ecology of activities and organizations. Those
organizations are highly creative and generate much new knowledge, whether in
industry or services. They have high levels of innovative capacity and must
sustain continuous streams of new inventions and innovations to survive. The
new ecology of organizations is most visible today in emerging new sectors and
activities, such as biotechnology, nanotechnology, bioinformatics, software
design, genomics, molecular computing and biorobotics.
The new ecology of
organizations and the sectors it is spawning are also playing a very important
role in the emergence of technocapitalism. Their impacts are likely to be felt
in most every aspect of life and work in decades to come. It is very likely
that those new sectors and activities may become to the twenty-first century
what aerospace and electronics were to the twentieth. The process of regional
inversion can draw much of its dynamic from those activities.
Third, regional inversion
depends greatly on the long-term accumulation of creative talents and skills.
Those talents are built up through the massification of educational access,
particularly in higher education. The massification of educational access
therefore creates a platform from which creativity, new knowledge and
eventually those activities mentioned above are spawned.
The massification of
educational access is also a major factor in the emergence of technocapitalism.
The intangibles upon which technocapitalism depends rely on massive access to
education. The generation, reproduction and sustenance of those intangibles are
largely a function of long-term investments in expanding access and providing
educational infrastructure. This aspect is therefore common both to the process
of regional inversion and to the emergence of technocapitalism.
Fourth, regional inversion
depends greatly on networks to assemble and expand the resources needed to
launch its dynamic. Networks are vital to overcome many obstacles to the
process of regional inversion. They, for example, dilute hierarchies that are
supportive of the status quo, and allow organizations and institutions to have
access to resources that they would not otherwise be able to obtain.
Decentralizing and fragmenting
the means of control are important functions of networks. These functions are
vital for regional inversion, since they can help overcome or dismantle the
structures that support the status quo and prevent change. Predominant regions
often secure their position by creating structures that make it very difficult
for lagging areas to advance or contest their hold on institutions, economic
sectors, and the social and political order. Oligarchic structures are often
the means by which those aspects are controlled. By allowing the possibility of
bypassing or dismantling those structures, networks can accelerate the dynamic
of regional inversion.
Networks are also playing a
very important role in the emergence of technocapitalism. Their tendency to
dilute hierarchies and to decentralize or fragment control, have allowed new
activities to emerge in a relatively short time. Networks have become a means
to access resources, acquire new knowledge and reproduce creativity, in ways
that many organizations and institutions would not be able to do on their own. Their
scale advantages have defied long established assumptions on the limitations of
organizational size and scope. By providing greater value through the rapid
expansion of access, networks have defied the belief that value can only be
derived from scarcity. All of these characteristics have supported the
emergence of technocapitalism, and they are also relevant to the process of
regional inversion.
Fifth, the globalization of
technocapitalism can be related to regional inversion. It may be possible for some
regions to bypass the structures of the status quo in their respective nations
by linking up with larger global processes. The containment imposed by a
predominant region in a national territory may thus be broken or bypassed by
reaching out and establishing international links. This possibility might have
been considered unrealistic not long ago, but the spread of networks, the new
logistics of exchange, advances in communication technologies, and an emerging
global order where intangibles displace material resources may make it more
feasible.
All of these aspects indicate
that the process of regional inversion might be related to the larger dynamic
of technocapitalism. Much remains to be known about both of these processes.
However, it is becoming apparent that there can be a potentially significant
correspondence between regional inversion and many aspects of technocapitalism.
For
additional information on technocapitalism, please see the website
www.technocapitalism.com
by
clicking on the banner below
For
publications on regional inversion and related topics by this author,
please
see the Publications section of this website.
Copyright © Luis Suarez-Villa